report - News - FoodAuthenticity2024-03-29T12:39:06Zhttps://www.foodauthenticity.global/blog/feed/tag/reportJRC Publishes Food Fraud Report on Spiceshttps://www.foodauthenticity.global/blog/jrc-publishes-food-fraud-report-on-spices2021-11-25T16:05:13.000Z2021-11-25T16:05:13.000ZSelvarani Elahihttps://www.foodauthenticity.global/members/SelvaraniElahi869<div><p><a href="{{#staticFileLink}}9850163887,RESIZE_1200x{{/staticFileLink}}"><img class="align-center" src="{{#staticFileLink}}9850163887,RESIZE_710x{{/staticFileLink}}" width="710" alt="9850163887?profile=RESIZE_710x" /></a></p>
<p>The European Commission published today the <a href="https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC126785">results of the first coordinated control plan on the authenticity of herbs and spices</a> launched by the Directorate-General for Health and Food Safety.</p>
<p>It has been carried out by 21 EU Member States, Switzerland and Norway, with the technical support of the Joint Research Centre, which performed nearly 10,000 analyses. The plan is the largest investigation so far into the authenticity of culinary herbs and spices in terms of participating countries and samples analysed (1885).</p>
<p>The main conclusions were as follows: </p>
<ul>
<li>The overall rate of suspicious samples was 17% (323 of a total of 1885 analysed samples), which is less than what was previously reported in the scientific literature or by national food control institutions.</li>
<li>The oregano supply chain was most vulnerable as 48% of samples were suspicious of being adulterated, in most cases with olive leaves.</li>
<li>The percentage of samples which were suspicious of adulteration were 17% for pepper, 14% for cumin, 11% for curcuma, and 11% for saffron.</li>
<li>The lowest suspicion rate (6%) was found for paprika/chilli.</li>
<li>The majority of suspicious samples contained non-declared plant material; in 2% of the analysed spice samples non-authorised dyes were detected. One sample contained a high level of lead chromate.</li>
<li>In two cumin, 45 oregano, and four pepper samples copper compounds above the relevant maximum residue limit set by Regulation (EC) No 396/2005 were found.</li>
<li>No specific trend regarding the rate of potential fraudulent manipulations along the supply chain (countries of origin/importers/wholesalers/processors/packagers) could be observed. However, for certain stages (domestic production, local markets, border control, and internet) the number of samples tested was too low to enable statistically meaningful comparisons.</li>
</ul>
<p>Read <a href="https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC126785" target="_blank">full report</a>.</p></div>Presentations from the Government Chemist Conference 2021https://www.foodauthenticity.global/blog/presentations-from-the-government-chemist-conference-20212021-08-10T17:34:54.000Z2021-08-10T17:34:54.000ZSelvarani Elahihttps://www.foodauthenticity.global/members/SelvaraniElahi869<div><p><img class="align-left" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/9405062272?profile=RESIZE_400x" width="300" alt="9405062272?profile=RESIZE_400x" />The Government Chemist 2021 Conference “Safe food for tomorrow’s world” took place online on 23 and 24 June. The conference included talks from 20 national and international speakers on topics from regulatory perspective, how food science can impact health outcomes and novel solutions for food authenticity and sustainability. The talks were well received by the 240+ participants who attended the conference for at least one talk.</p>
<p>This event had originally been planned for June 2020, then postponed to June 2021 and finally delivered as an online event. The transition to the online platform did present technical challenges and limited the interaction between participants. However, it also presented an opportunity to engage a greater number of stakeholders at UK and international level.</p>
<h3 id="participants">Participants</h3>
<p>A significant proportion of participants (approx 50%) represented UK government departments and local authorities from all the nations.</p>
<p>There were also participants from trade associations, industry, consultants, consumer advocacy groups, press and independent attendants.</p>
<p>The vast majority of attendants joined from the UK. However, people joined from Turkey, Slovakia, Latvia, Uruguay and Hong Kong.</p>
<h3 id="feedback">Feedback</h3>
<p>In feedback received from a selection of participants approximately 42.5% of respondents felt it was better than expected, 9% said it was much better than expected and 48.5% said that the conference met their expectations.</p>
<p><a class="govuk-link" href="https://www.gov.uk/government/news/safe-food-for-tomorrows-world-conference-presentations">Presentations from the conference are available</a>.</p></div>JRC February 2021 Food Fraud Monthly Summaryhttps://www.foodauthenticity.global/blog/jrc-february-2021-food-fraud-monthly-summary2021-03-05T14:26:10.000Z2021-03-05T14:26:10.000ZSelvarani Elahihttps://www.foodauthenticity.global/members/SelvaraniElahi869<div><p><a href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/8634531300?profile=RESIZE_1200x" target="_blank"><img class="align-center" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/8634531300?profile=RESIZE_710x" width="710" alt="8634531300?profile=RESIZE_710x" /></a></p>
<p> </p>
<p> </p>
<p>The European Commission's Joint Research Centre (JRC) has published its February 2021 Food Fraud Monthly Summary reporting food fraud incidents and investigations from around the world. </p>
<p>Thanks again to our Member <a href="https://www.linkedin.com/in/brunosechet/" target="_blank">Bruno Séchet</a> for creating this infographic and allowing us to share it with the rest of the Network</p>
<p>Read the February 2021 Summary <a href="http://knowledge4policy.ec.europa.eu/publication/food-fraud-summary-january-2021_en" target="_blank">here</a></p></div>UK organic sector set to be worth £2.5bn by 2020https://www.foodauthenticity.global/blog/uk-organic-sector-set-to-be-worth-2-5bn-by-20202019-02-14T10:29:32.000Z2019-02-14T10:29:32.000ZSelvarani Elahihttps://www.foodauthenticity.global/members/SelvaraniElahi869<div><p><a href="{{#staticFileLink}}1055230430,RESIZE_930x{{/staticFileLink}}" target="_blank" rel="noopener"><img class="align-full" src="{{#staticFileLink}}1055230430,RESIZE_710x{{/staticFileLink}}" width="710" /></a></p>
<p class="lead"><strong>The 2019 Organic Market Report reveals that the UK organic market continues to grow. The market is now in to its 8th year of steady, loyal growth, growing +5.3% in 2018 and on target to reach £2.5bn by 2020.</strong></p>
<p>The 2019 Organic Market Report is the most comprehensive report covering the organic market in the UK today. It is an essential read and reference document for anyone researching or working within the industry, selling organic products or assisting businesses in selling organic in the UK.</p>
<p>The report takes a detailed look at the sales trends across all channels and the major reasons for this growth – it includes updates on the performance of organic in supermarkets, independent retailers, the food service sector and a spotlight on home delivery.</p>
<p>It shares the output from recent consumer research that considers the organic customer, how they shop and what influences their decision making, as well as some interesting take-outs around hot topics like packaging and wider environmental issues that continue to influence shopper choices.</p>
<p>The report also covers farming and the opportunities for export and growth internationally. It takes a look at the year ahead and some of the key challenges and opportunities facing the organic industry.</p>
<p>The report is free for Soil Association Certification licensees (you just need your licence number) and costs £100 +VAT to purchase for non-licensees.</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><a title="" href="https://www.soilassociation.org/certification/market-research-and-data/download-the-organic-market-report/" target="_blank" rel="noopener" data-original-title="Download the 2019 Organic Market Report"><strong>Download the 2019 Organic Market Report</strong></a></span></p>
</div>UK Government highlights the importance of measurement in our everyday liveshttps://www.foodauthenticity.global/blog/uk-government-highlights-the-importance-of-measurement-in-our-eve2017-10-09T15:13:59.000Z2017-10-09T15:13:59.000ZSelvarani Elahihttps://www.foodauthenticity.global/members/SelvaraniElahi869<div><img src="https://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/2246581?profile=RESIZE_400x&width=400"></div><div><p><font face="Calibri" size="3">The UK National Measurement System’s (NMS) Annual highlights report has been published. The report provides a snapshot of the achievements and the impact of the NMS, and demonstrates how measurement plays a vital role in all aspects of our lives.</font></p>
<p><font size="3"><font face="Calibri">Every time you get a Certificate of Analysis for an authenticity test of one of your products or, more generally, use your GPS, put petrol in your car, receive a medical diagnosis etc. you are putting your trust in measurements that are underpinned by a system that ensures they are both reliable and internationally recognised. </font></font></p>
<p><font face="Calibri" size="3">The Government invests approximately £65m every year in our measurement infrastructure, and it provides important support for evidence-based policy and regulation.</font></p>
<ul>
<li>
<p>The report shows that the NMS is collaborative, with 445 active academic partnerships delivering key priorities across all sectors, of advanced manufacturing, energy and environment, life sciences and digital.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Measurement enables trade, and the NMS provides vital support to industry. In 2016/17 the NMS offered 437 different measurement services to over 731 different customers across the UK.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The reach of the NMS is nationwide, and has a significant pool of knowledge that is shared through products, services, reference materials, event best practice guides and online resources.</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>The NMS is providing important skills capabilities for now and in the future, by running a broad range of specialist training programmes and offering a trailblazer apprenticeship standard for metrology technicians.  In 2016/17, 1,189 people have been trained across 57 training courses</p>
</li>
<li>
<p>Important work has started in identifying the most pressing industry challenges in the quality, reliability and integrity of data.</p>
</li>
</ul>
<p><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/national-measurement-system-annual-review-2016-to-2017" target="_blank">UK NMS Annual highlights report.</a><font face="Calibri" size="3"> </font></p>
</div>156 Food Fraud Cases Reported in 2016 by the EU Food Fraud Networkhttps://www.foodauthenticity.global/blog/156-food-fraud-cases-reported-in-2016-by-the-eu-food-fraud-networ2017-06-01T13:06:22.000Z2017-06-01T13:06:22.000ZSelvarani Elahihttps://www.foodauthenticity.global/members/SelvaraniElahi869<div><p><font size="3">EU Food Fraud Network has published its report for 2016 which shows that 156 food fraud cases were dealt with (147 food & 9 feed). Of these, the top five commodities that fraud was observed in were:</font></p>
<ol>
<li>
<p><span class="font-size-3">Meat & meat products (excluding poultry)</span></p>
</li>
<li>
<p><span class="font-size-3">Fish & fish products</span></p>
</li>
<li>
<p><span class="font-size-3">Fats & oils</span></p>
</li>
<li>
<p><span class="font-size-3">Poultry meat & poultry meat products</span></p>
</li>
<li>
<p><span class="font-size-3">Milk & milk products</span></p>
</li>
</ol>
<p><b><font size="3"> </font></b><font size="3">M</font><font size="3">islabelling composition was, <font size="3">by far,</font> the largest violation observed.</font></p>
<p><font size="3"><font size="3">Read the full</font> <a href="https://ec.europa.eu/food/sites/food/files/safety/docs/food-fraud_network_activity_report_2016.pdf"><font color="#0000FF" size="3">report</font></a> <font size="3">by the European Commission.</font></font></p>
<p><b><font size="3">The EU Food Fraud Network</font></b></p>
<p><font size="3">As provided for in Title IV of Regulation (EC) N° 882/2004, where the outcome of official controls on food and feed requires action in more than one Member State, competent authorities in the Member States concerned shall provide each other with administrative assistance. Upon receiving a reasoned request, the requested competent authorities shall ensure that the requesting competent authority is provided with all the necessary information and documents enabling the latter to verify compliance with feed and food law within its jurisdiction. An administrative assistance may also end up with two or more competent authorities participating in a joint inspection.</font></p>
<p><font size="3">Liaison bodies are at the very core of the mechanism of administrative assistance. These are designated within a Member State to assist and coordinate communication between competent authorities. The role of liaison bodies is essential for the good functioning of administrative assistance, as each liaison body has the exact understanding of how competences are shared within its Member State, thus allowing the information to swiftly reach its destination.</font></p>
<p><font size="3">Empowering liaison bodies with a dedicated tool soon became a necessity. At the beginning, information exchange was carried out through conventional means such as letters, emails and phone calls. However, the horsemeat scandal of 2013 proved the need for a streamlined method of communication. The Rapid Alert System for Food and Feed was the only viable tool for these exchanges, however the horsemeat crisis did not show any profiles of public health risks, thus falling outside the scope of that system. In response to that crisis, the <b>EU Food Fraud Network</b></font> <font size="3">was set up with the aim of allowing the EU countries to work in accordance with the rules laid down in Articles 36-40 of the Official Controls Regulation (Regulation 882/2004, rules on administrative cooperation and assistance) in matters where the national authorities are confronted with possible intentional violations of food chain law with a cross-border impact.</font></p>
<p><font size="3">The EU Food Fraud Network consists of contact points in the EU Member States, in Switzerland, Norway, Iceland and the Commission. The contact points of the EU Food Fraud Network are representatives of the authorities designated by each Member State for the purpose of ensuring cross-border administrative cooperation with their counterparts in the other Member States in matters of suspected intentional and economically motivated violations.</font></p>
<p></p>
</div>Read the annual report for 2015 from the government chieft scientific advisorhttps://www.foodauthenticity.global/blog/read-the-annual-report-for-2015-from-the-government-chieft-scient2016-05-06T10:01:54.000Z2016-05-06T10:01:54.000ZSelvarani Elahihttps://www.foodauthenticity.global/members/SelvaraniElahi869<div><p><span class="font-size-3"><font size="3">FORENSIC SCIENCE AND BEYOND: AUTHENTICITY, PROVENANCE AND ASSURANCE</font></span></p>
<p><span class="font-size-3"><font size="3">This report is about the power of analytical science and its many applications. It starts with forensics – the use of analytical science to assist the courts with issues such as identity and identification. But the power of forensic analysis has the ability to deliver benefits to society that go far beyond the Criminal Justice System. This report explores the many ways in which we can use analytical scientific tools, combined with the approaches and skills of the forensic scientist, to reap the rewards of these benefits. Why produce a report about forensic science and its broad applications now? The majority of the advice to the government from the Government Chief Scientific Adviser falls into three domains. These are:</font></span></p>
<ol>
<li>
<p><span class="font-size-3">the identification of emerging technology and advice on how government can derive greatest benefit for the economy, policymaking and delivery of government services;</span></p>
</li>
<li>
<p><span class="font-size-3">the provision of evidence supporting the development of government policy; and</span></p>
</li>
<li>
<p><span class="font-size-3">support for national resilience and security.</span></p>
</li>
</ol>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p><span class="font-size-3"><a href="https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/506461/gs-15-37a-forensic-science-beyond-report.pdf" target="_blank"><font size="3">Read full report</font></a></span></p>
</div>